TIME magazine has now tossed it's hat into the ring in the sexual exploitation of children panic that's brewing surrounding Brazil's World's Cup. You can read it here.
This is my response, which Time won't let me publish in their "Comments" section.
Hi. I'm an anthropologist who has been studying prostitution, sexuakl tourism and trafficking in Brazil for some ten years now.
Let me address some of the misconceptions this article raises.
1)
Brazil has a very large problem with the sexual exploitation of
children. Like most countries, however, the vast majority of this
problem is not concentrated in brothels or in the tourism sector, but
out in the neighborhoods and in the Brazilian family itself. As an
example, the city of Forteleza (one of the host cities of the World's
Cup) currently has open twenty cases of underaged prostitution (six of
which involve foreigners) and TWO THOUSAND cases of sexual exploitation
of children that have nothing to do with prostitution or tourism. This
is an issue which our family-values oriented congressmen and -women,
like Ms. Liliam Sá, cited above, simply do not want to deal with. It is
much more politically expedient to bang the sexual tourism panic drum
than to say anything against the sacred Brazilian family, which
generates the vast majority of cases of sexual abuse and exploitation in
our country.
2)
Not to suggest that an ex-pimp and child trafficker who's claimed to
have found Jesus might not be an honest or accurate witness, but in ten
years of work researching Rio de Janeiro's brothels - and particularly
the sex work venues that cater to tourists - I have not encountered a
single child prostitute. Frequent police raids on these establishments
also generally come up a cropper. There are a few cases, of course, but I
can count them on the fingers of one hand, from over a ten year period.
Where, then, are these legions of child prostitutes? If the police and I
and my co-researcher, Dra. Ana Paula da Silva can't find more than a
handful in all the hundreds of commercial sex venues in Rio de Janeiro -
and believe me, we've been actively looking for underaged sex workers -
then where are these kids?
3)
Before every major sports event over the last 20 years, there have been
apocalyptic claims that the invasion of legions of sports fans would
lead to an increase in prostitution and a consequent increase in
trafficking. These claims have NEVER been substantiated: in fact,
they've been consistently debunked. Before the World's Cup in Germany,
it was estimated that 40,000 women would be trafficked for the games:
during the event, massive police actions discovered discovered five. You
can read the report of one of the oldest and most prestigious global
anti-trafficking organizations regarding the false claim that sports
creates trafficking here: http://www.gaatw.org/.../WhatstheCostofaRumour.11.15.2011...
Please read it and decide for yourself what evidence exists that sports
causes trafficking and the sexual exploitation of children.
4)
The moral panics surrounding trafficking and the sexual exploitation of
children at mega sporting events have often resulted in public policies
that do not help children but which criminalize and mistreat
prostitutes. This was the case at last year's Superbowl in New Orleans,
where a local and federal task force arrested close to 100 women and
found 5 possible victims of trafficking (who were released and never
showed up to court). The arrested women lost their children, lost their
non-prostitutio-related jobs, acquired police records, got jail time (in
some cases, years) and were stigmatized, all in the name of saving
victims that were never found. In city after city, pre-game
"anti-trafficking" campaigns have been used to arrest and brutalize
prostitutes and they have never - repeat NEVER - discovered the hordes
of trafficking victims police claim exist. Either the world's police are
completely incompetent when it comes to finding these victims or we are
being lied to by people who profit - politically and otherwise - from a
terrified populace.
5)
It is particularly disheartening to see Brazil's award-winning anti-HIV
campaign maligned by Liliam Sá as somehow "promoting child
prostitution". The cornerstone of Brazil's campaign, which has been
proven effective, has been to treat prostitutes like adult citizens,
with all the rights and responsabilities that entails. This is because
it is a well known fact that HIV prevention campaigns have a direct link
in efficacy with sex worker self-esteem. The campaign in question was
organized and created by sex workers themselves and it was set up to
encourage people to see them as citizens worthy of dignity and respect
and not as criminals or powerless victims. It had NO connection to child
sexual exploitation, nor did it portray prostitution as a great
experience. The campaign was cancelled after complaints by the Christian
far right: not because it encouraged child prostitution. It verges on
journalistic dishonesty that TIME would cast the campaign in this light
without allowing a dissenting voice to contradict Sá's incredibly
ideologically-imbued reading of the campaign. Listening to Liliam Sá
regarding prostitutes is like listening to Michelle Bachmann regarding
gays.
Brazil
has dozens of sex workers'rightds associations: how is it that TIME
magazine couldn't be bothered to talk to even one of these, but has
instead taken all its primary sources from groups which have a vested
political interest in the criminalization of sex workers, particularly
far right religious groups?
In
short, as someone who is intimately associated with prostitutes' rights
organizations in Brazil, I fear that the frankly yellow journalism
which surrounds this issue is going to lead - as it has lead in other
World's Cups and Olympics - to the criminalization, expulsion and
marginalization of an already vulnerable population: sex workers.
Arresting and stigmatizing adult, consensual sex workers does absolutely
NOTHING to save enslaved children.
Oh,
and by the way... Speaking from long experience, I highly doubt that
"Thiago" is telling the truth about a single damned thing when it comes
to his past experience. If he's being honest about himself, this is a
guy who ran child sex slaves, didn't spend a day in jail for it and who
now claims that Jesus has made everything all better. This is obviously
the type of guy TIME should NOT use as primary source when it comes to
reporting on a very sensitive and complicated story. Why has "Thiago"
been interviewed and not a single woman from any one of Brazil's
numerous sex worker organizations?
Apparently, TIME - like Liliam Sá - doesn't feel that sex workers have anything worthwhile to say about themselves.
Sister Sledge: He’s the Greatest Dancer
5 days ago